Acer Swift 3
- The Acer Swift 3’s discrete graphics inject a shot of efficiency in an otherwise plain laptop.
- Solid efficiency
- Entry-level gaming thanks to discrete GPU
- Very good battery life
- Comfy keyboard and touch pad
- Great value
The Acer Swift is efficient and offers discrete graphics. However, effective graphics and an economical price don’t generally go together. That can be an issue for students or creative specialists on a budget. Acer’s 2019 refresh of its Swift 3 14-inch laptop computer is a prime example. It’s ideal at the premium cutoff of $1,000 and it consists of an Nvidia GeForce MX150 that’s excellent enough for light video gaming and accelerating innovative applications.
Acer sent us the high-end configuration that costs $1,000. It’s fully equipped, sporting
- an 8th-gen Whiskey Lake Core i7-8565U CPU,
- 8GB of RAM,
- a 256GB PCIe solid-state drive (SSD),
- and a 14-inch IPS Full HD (1,920 x 1,080) screen.
The previous version of the laptopv cost $680 for the very same quantity of RAM and storage however with a Core i5. Plus it was limited to integrated Intel HD graphics. Does the change in processor and graphics power do enough to call for the considerably greater price?
Acer Swift silver chassis …
The Acer Swift 3 has a silver, all-aluminum chassis with chrome chamfered edges, and black trim around the screen, Simply put, it’s similar to every other clamshell laptop with a silver chassis and comparable trimmings. It looks a lot like the Acer Swift 5, just smaller sized, while another 14-inch laptop computer, the Asus ZenBook 14 UX433, is far more striking and vibrant.
Not every all-aluminum chassis is developed the very same, though. The lid and keyboard deck are just a bit too flexible. There’s insufficient give to make us question its durability. However we like the ZenBook 14 and Asus ZenBook 13 UX333 for their more solid chassis (and their MIL-STD-810g accreditation that promises sturdiness). Once again, the Swift 3 is fine, but it’s not the very best we’ve tested. The Swift 3 loses to the ZenBook 14 is in terms of its chassis size.
Asus has actually completely embraced the tiny bezel motion, and the ZenBook’s 92 percent screen-to-body ratio is a class leader. That makes the Swift 3’s side bezels– though smaller sized than the previous generation– and rather large top and bottom bezels seem comically big in comparison. Those bezels let the ZenBook 14 available in at 12.56 inches broad by 7.83 inches deep, compared to the Swift 3 at 12.72 inches by 8.98 inches.
More About The build
The Acer Swift 3 is thinner than the ZenBook 14, at 0.59 inches versus 0.63 inches, and that’s a plus. It’s much heavier, however, at 2.98 pounds compared to 2.62 pounds. The size of the Swift 3 is extremely near the Huawei MateBook X Pro with its less common 3:2 element ratio 14-inch display screen is really close at 0.57 inches and 2.9 pounds. That makes the Acer 3 thin and light for a 14-inch laptop.
Connectivity is decent for such a thin laptop, with a USB-C 3.1 Gen 2 port supporting display and power, 2 USB-A 3.0 ports, and a full-size HDMI port. There’s no SD card reader, which is a disappointment, but there’s a Kensington Lock slot for the security-conscious.
Wireless connection is cutting edge, with an Intel combination chip that offers gigabit Wi-Fi 802.11 a/c and the most recent Bluetooth 5.0. You will not have the ability to link an external GPU, therefore the integrated graphics will need to fit you.
The keyboard is simply a touch too firm Getting the best keyboard feel isbe a difficult. Too loose or mushy or too tight, and long typing sessions can be stressful. The Swift 3‘s rather normal island keyboard with black chiclet secrets falls just inside that spectrum. It has adequate travel and a nice click, making it exact. However the mechanism is simply the slightest bit too firm.
The ZenBook 14 and the Dell XPS 13 have stylish keyboards with a lighter touch, making them somewhat more comfy. The Swift 3’s plastic touchpad is less enigmatic. It takes up the readily available space on the keyboard deck and allows for comfy swiping. Its plastic texture provides simply the right mix of smooth feedback. It’s a Microsoft Precision touchpad therefore it supports the complete variety of Windows 10 multitouch gestures. It’s the equal of the best Windows touchpads around.
The display isn’t touch-enabled, though, which’s a disappointment. When you have actually gotten used to quickly tapping buttons and scrolling long web pages with a finger and a thumb, it feels odd when a screen doesn’t react. There are some small weight and power cost savings, not to point out the expense, however at $1,000, the Swift 3 feels insufficient without a touchscreen.
Finally, the Swift 3 counts on a finger print scanner to the right of the keyboard for Windows 10 password-less login. We had some problem training it, and then it wasn’t constantly responsive in real-life use. Hopefully, that’s something Acer can enhance with a software application update.
Acer Swift Full HD display
Acer uses the Swift 3 with simply one screen choice: A shiny 14-inch Full HD (1,920 x 1,080 or 157 PPI) screen. It’s sharp enough for a lot of users, and as an IPS panel, it promises good viewing angles and a pleasant experience.
According to our colorimeter, that’s precisely what you’re getting. The display is right in line with other contemporary mainstream laptop computer panels. That means it’s an excellent screen that the majority of people will enjoy. However it may not fulfill the requirements of creative types.
Brightness was listed below our preferred 300 nit threshold, at 260 nits. It will be intense enough for the typical office. However extreme overhead lighting and definitely sunlight will overwhelm things and make the display screen tough to check out. The contrast was simply okay at 710:1, which is ideal in the middle of our contrast group, ahead of the Lenovo Yoga C930 however behind the Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon and XPS 13.
Unless you’re a creative expert, the Swift 3’s screen ought to satisfy.
The color range is also typical, at 73 percent of AdobeRGB. All however spending plan screens fall in this range, and you’ll wish to look at more premium choices to get into the 90 percent range that assures the best colors for image and video modifying. The ThinkPad X1 Carbon is slightly much better while the ZenBook 14 and Yoga C930 are slightly worse. Color precision was 1.34, which is very good (less than 1.0 is considered outstanding) and ahead of all the laptops in our comparison group.
Lastly, gamma is a bit off at 2.1 (2.2 is best), implying that Netflix videos will be a bit brighter than the should. In general, though, we found the display rather enjoyable to utilize. It doesn’t stand out, however unless you’re an innovative type trying to find a really vibrant screen, then the Swift 3’s panel need to satisfy.
The audio didn’t impress us one way or another. The dual downward-firing speakers on the bottom of the chassis provided plenty of volume without considerable distortion, however the quality didn’t rise above the common laptop experience. There’s no bass to mention, therefore you’ll want to pull out some headphones to really enjoy your tunes and Netflix binging.
Strong but not spectacular efficiency
The Swift 3 runs on the current and biggest Intel CPU, the Scotch Lake 8th-generation quad-core Core i7-8565U. In our experience, that generally indicates solid productivity performance and excellent performance.
We used our normal benchmark tests and found that the Swift 3 makes good use of its parts. In the Geekbench 4 artificial benchmark, the Acer scored 5,231 in the single-core test and 15,116 in the multi-core test. That’s in line with the same CPU amongst our contrast group in the single-core criteria, and right in the middle when utilizing numerous cores.
In our Handbrake test that encodes a 420MB video to H. 265, the Swift 3 finish in 269 seconds. That’s not as fast as the ZenBook 14 or Dell Inspiron 13 7386, however it matches the XPS 13. The Core i5-8250 in the ThinkPad X1 Carbon was much slower at 370 seconds.
The Kingston PCIe SSD, on the other hand, was slower than we like. It scored 857 megabytes per 2nd (MB/s) in the CrystalDiskMark 5.x read test and 765 MB/s in the compose test. Those ratings aren’t terrific for PCIe drives, with the Swift 3 coming close to the ZenBook 14’s performance but falling well behind the remainder of the field in read performance.
If you can step down in performance, then there’s a Core i5-8265U choice that will save some cash. Oddly, you can upgrade to a 512GB SSD with the Core i5 however there’s no option for the bigger capability to opt for the much faster Core i7. The Swift 3 is not user-upgradeable.
Thermal performance was a real strength of the Swift 3. During our most aggressive screening, consisting of encoding a video, running our gaming criteria, and running 3DMark tension tests, the chassis never got more than warm, and the fans were never too loud. The highest temperature we measured was on the bottom near the rear, which only reached 101 degrees F.
Overall, you’re getting plenty of performance for the laptop’s $1,000 cost– you might spend hundreds more and not see a significant distinction. The laptop computer is plenty fast for whatever productivity task you throw at it, and then the discrete GPU means that imaginative applications can enjoy a genuine increase also.
Entry-level video gaming is in the cards
Nvidia’s GeForce MX150 graphics typically guarantee entry-level gaming efficiency that’s a genuine step up from Intel’s incorporated GPUs. We were anticipating seeing if the Swift 3 would make great usage of that additional video gaming performance.
First, we ran the 3DMark Fire Strike test, where the Swift 3 scored 2,607. That’s more than twice as fast as our comparison laptops with incorporated Intel UHD 620 graphics, and somewhat much better than the MX150-equipped version of the ZenBook 14.
To gauge the Swift 3 in regards to its real-world performance, we ran a number of video gaming standards that are in line with the level of CPU. In Civilization VI, the Acer managed a playable 37 frames per second (FPS) at 1080p and medium graphics, which dropped to 16 FPS at ultra graphics. In Fortnite, the Swift 3 struck 32 FPS at 1080p and high graphics and 28 FPS at ultra graphics. That makes the Acer somewhat faster than the ZenBook 14 in Civilization VI and nearly identical in Fortnite.
While the laptop computer can’t keep up with those running much faster GeForce GTX or RTX GPUs, it’s good enough for esports titles and for some modern titles at 1080p and with the graphical quality refused. More importantly, it’s significantly much better than laptop computers that are limited to Intel’s integrated graphics.
Battery life is strong if you’re not pushing the CPU
The Swift 3 packs in 50 watt-hours of battery capability, which is a little light for a 14-inch laptop computer that doesn’t try to be the tiniest around. The Scotch Lake 8th-gen CPU is efficient, and the Full HD resolution suggests the battery won’t be taxed by powering too many pixels.
Acer Swift Testing
In our standard tests, the Acer succeeded, but it didn’t break any records. In our most requiring Basemark web benchmark, for example, the Swift 3 handled simply over 3 hours. Which is lower than the ZenBook 14’s somewhat more than four hours and the ThinkPad X1 Carbon’s 6 hours.
Unless you’re pressing the CPU, the Swift 3 will likely last you a complete working day.
In our web searching test, the Swift 3 was more powerful at 9 hours, vanquishing the ZenBook 14’s roughly 8 hours and destroying the ThinkPad X1 Carbon’s six and a half hours. And when looping our regional test Avengers trailer, the Swift 3 was once again really strong at over 15 hours. The ZenBook 14 barely lasted 11 hours, and the ThinkPad X1 Carbon petered out after just eight hours.
The bottom line is that unless you’re pushing the CPU, the Swift 3 will likely last you a full working day. Note that engaging the discrete GPU during video gaming and while running creativity applications will suck down a lot more power.
Acer Swift Conclusion
In the beginning the Acer Swift 3 is underwhelming. It’s not fantastic looking, its build quality is excellent but not terrific, and its rate appears a little high. However then when you consider the discrete GPU, look at its strong efficiency, and then consider its excellent battery life. Then the Swift 3 becomes a more compelling option.
Is there a much better option?
If we look specifically at 14-inch laptops, the Asus ZenBook 14 is the most direct contrast. It’s much smaller thanks to some tiny bezels, it offers comparable performance, but its battery life can’t keep up. You could buy the MX150 variation in the United States at $1,300 with 16GB of RAM and a 512GB SSD. If you can deal with integrated graphics, then the ZenBook 14 is likewise $1,000 for a Core i5-8265U CPU, 8GB of RAM, and a 256GB SSD.
You could likewise think about the Asus ZenBook 13 if you want to drop down a bit in screen size. The current UX333 version sports the exact same excellent looks as the ZenBook 13. You’ll lose the discrete GPU and you’ll step down in processor performance. However you’ll also pay just $850 for a Core i5-8265U, 8GB of RAM, and a 256GB SSD. And the ZenBook 13’s display has far better contrast and is a really enjoyable panel overall.
If you’re willing to leap up in rate, then the Huawei MateBook X Pro is a good option. It offers a beautiful 3:2 display screen that’s terrific for performance, and offers strong build quality. It’s significantly more pricey, however, at over $2,000 for similarly equipped devices.
The length of time will it last?
The Acer Swift 3 isn’t the most robust construction around, however it should still last you as long along time. There’s a basic 1-year guarantee that, as usual, is disappointing however an industry requirement.
Should you purchase the Acer Swift?
Acer Swift 3 SF315-52 Notebook – (Intel Core i7-8550U, 8GB RAM, 256GB SSD, 15.6″ FHD IPS Display, Silver